Ezekia: Overview and Positioning
What is Ezekia?
Ezekia is an ATS specialized in executive search and C-level recruiting. The platform primarily targets headhunting firms and recruiters specializing in senior executive profiles.Ezekia's Positioning
| Criterion | Evaluation |
|---|---|
| Specialization | Executive search |
| Target | Headhunting firms |
| Interface | Functional but dated |
| Outreach | Limited |
| AI | Basic |
Common Problems with Ezekia
Despite its specialization, Ezekia has several limitations:
| Problem | Impact |
|---|---|
| Slow | ~1 second per page load |
| Slow Chrome extension | Latency and reliability issues |
| Limited search | Basic keywords only |
| No transcription | Manual notes or third-party tool (+$50/month) |
| Complex outreach | Laborious configuration |
| Cluttered interface | Hard to maintain clear overview |
Why Look for an Ezekia Alternative?
The Speed Problem
In recruitment, speed matters. Ezekia shows average load times of about 1 second per page.
This might seem acceptable, but compared to modern platforms (~0.1 seconds):
- These delays accumulate over a busy day
- Each second of lag disrupts the workflow
- Recruiters delay or forget important updates
Failing LinkedIn Extension
A fast, reliable Chrome extension is crucial for professional recruiters.
"Ezekia's extension suffers from latency and reliability issues, delaying access to critical candidate data."
In a job where every second counts, a slow extension creates unnecessary frustration.
Keyword-Limited Search
Ezekia's search is limited to basic keywords:
- Doesn't understand unstructured data (emails, notes, CVs)
- Search results often incomplete
- No semantic understanding
No Built-in Transcription
Focus during interviews is essential. Ezekia offers no built-in transcription:
- Recruiters must take notes manually
- Or use third-party tool (+$50/recruiter/month)
- Risk missing important information
Cobalt vs Ezekia: Detailed Comparison
Overview
| Criterion | Cobalt | Ezekia |
|---|---|---|
| Positioning | Unified ATS+CRM+Staffing platform | Executive search ATS |
| Target | Staffing firms, agencies, exec search | Headhunting firms |
| Speed | < 0.5 seconds | ~1 second |
| Interface | Modern, intuitive | Functional, cluttered |
| AI | Semantic search, matching | Basic |
| Support | Local, responsive | Variable |
User Experience (UX)
| Criterion | Cobalt | Ezekia |
|---|---|---|
| Load time | < 0.5 seconds | ~1 second |
| Design | Modern 2024 | Dated |
| Interface clarity | ✅ Clean | 🟡 Cluttered |
| Learning curve | Few hours | Several days |
| Mobile app | ✅ | 🟡 |
On a day with 500 page changes:
Want to go further?
Discover how Cobalt can help you.
- Ezekia: 500 seconds (~8 minutes) lost
- Cobalt: 50 seconds lost
- Daily gain: 7+ minutes
Sourcing and LinkedIn Extension
| Feature | Cobalt | Ezekia |
|---|---|---|
| Chrome extension | ✅ Fast, reliable | 🟡 Slow, bugs |
| Instant import | ✅ | 🟡 Delay |
| CV parsing | ✅ Native AI | ✅ |
| Auto enrichment | ✅ | 🟡 Limited |
| Real-time sync | ✅ | 🟡 |
"The extension suffers from latency and reliability issues, delaying access to critical candidate data. In recruitment where every second counts, a slow extension creates unnecessary frustration."Sourcing Verdict: Cobalt offers a reliable, instant extension.
Search and Matching
| Feature | Cobalt | Ezekia |
|---|---|---|
| AI semantic search | ✅ True vectorization | ❌ |
| Natural language search | ✅ | ❌ |
| Basic keywords | ✅ | ✅ |
| Search in emails/notes | ✅ | ❌ |
| Candidate-job matching | ✅ Automatic AI | 🟡 Manual |
| Contextual understanding | ✅ | ❌ |
With Cobalt, search "senior AI/ML engineers with Python, TensorFlow or similar tools" and get relevant results.
With Ezekia, you must build complex Boolean queries and risk missing candidates.
What Ezekia misses:"Ezekia's search is limited to basic keywords, missing insights from unstructured data sources like emails, notes and resumes, often leading to incomplete search results."Search Verdict: Cobalt uses true semantic AI, Ezekia stays with keywords.
Interviews and Notes
| Feature | Cobalt | Ezekia |
|---|---|---|
| Built-in AI transcription | ✅ Native | ❌ |
| Automatic notes | ✅ | ❌ (manual) |
| Third-party integration | ✅ Optional | 🟡 Required (+$50/month) |
| Auto field updates | ✅ AI | ❌ |
| Interview summary | ✅ | ❌ |
"Ezekia offers no built-in transcription, forcing recruiters to take manual notes or rely on third-party tools, which hurts efficiency and risks missing important insights."Additional cost: +$50/recruiter/month for external transcription tool. Interview Verdict: Cobalt includes AI transcription, Ezekia requires paid tool.
Staffing Features
| Feature | Cobalt | Ezekia |
|---|---|---|
| Assignment management | ✅ Native | ❌ |
| Consultant assignment | ✅ AI Matching | ❌ |
| Bench tracking | ✅ | ❌ |
| Rate management | ✅ | ❌ |
| Planning view | ✅ | ❌ |
Summary Table: Cobalt vs Ezekia
| Criterion | Winner | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | 🏆 Cobalt | 2x faster |
| LinkedIn extension | 🏆 Cobalt | Reliable vs bugs |
| AI Search | 🏆 Cobalt | Semantic vs keywords |
| Transcription | 🏆 Cobalt | Included vs +$50/month |
| Interface | 🏆 Cobalt | Modern vs cluttered |
| Staffing | 🏆 Cobalt | Native vs nonexistent |
| Executive search | 🟡 Tie | Both suited |
| Outreach | 🏆 Cobalt | Simple vs complex |
Conclusion: Ezekia or Cobalt?
Choose Ezekia if:
- You're a pure headhunting firm
- You don't need speed
- You're willing to pay for transcription
- You don't need staffing features
Choose Cobalt if:
- You want a fast, modern platform
- You're looking for true semantic AI
- You want transcription included
- You need staffing features
- You want a reliable LinkedIn extension
- You're looking for a simple-to-configure tool
Ready to discover a better Ezekia alternative?
Request a free Cobalt demo and experience faster, smarter recruiting.
