Cobalt

Cobalt vs Vincere 2025: Complete Comparison and Best Alternative

Gregory Hissiger
Gregory Hissiger
December 17, 202511 min read
Comparison between two ATS platforms for recruiting agencies

Vincere: Overview and Positioning

What is Vincere?

Vincere is an ATS/CRM founded in 2012, positioned as a Bullhorn alternative for recruiting agencies. The platform was acquired by Access Group in 2021, marking a turning point in product development and customer service.

Vincere's Positioning

CriterionEvaluation
SpecializationTemporary staffing, contracting
TargetSMB recruiting agencies
InterfaceVisually appealing
Back-officePayroll, shift management
AcquisitionAccess Group (2021)

Common Problems with Vincere

Since the Access Group acquisition, Vincere faces recurring criticism:

ProblemDetail
Degraded supportAI-first, no human support on weekends
Third-party toolsLinkedIn extension and parsing via third parties
Manual searchDepends on manual tagging
Unsynchronized emailSync only 1x/day
No integrated outreachSeparate purchase required
Rigid contractsAuto-renewal, 3-month notice
Price increases+6.5% in April 2025

Why Look for a Vincere Alternative?

The Customer Support Problem

Vincere support is the most consistent criticism, especially since the Access Group acquisition:

"Rather than using AI to enhance the user experience, Vincere opted to replace much of their customer service team with AI. Support is AI-first, and if the AI cannot assist, no human support is available on weekends."
Reported problematic practices:
  • Poor communication and unresolved issues
  • Aggressive sales tactics
  • Less support after declining paid add-ons
  • Discount offers for positive reviews (Trustpilot manipulation)
"They offered me 50% discount to change my review to 5 stars, which led me to change it to 1 star. The reviews on Trustpilot are being manipulated by this company."

Dependence on Third-Party Tools

Vincere depends on third-party solutions for key features:

FeatureThird-party
CV ParsingDaxtra (paid)
LinkedIn ExtensionSeha Solutions
Automated OutreachElay.io (acquired)

This dependence means:

  • Less control over features
  • Slower innovation
  • Additional costs
"I spend several hours running the same search which would have taken me an hour or 90 minutes tops before. I am now running behind competitors. You cannot remove people from your search and rerun to see who is new."

Vincere search:

  • Depends on accumulated manual tagging
  • Uses complex Boolean queries
  • Gives no context on why a candidate was selected

Email and Outreach Problems

Vincere offers an integrated inbox, but:

  • Syncs only 1x/day (unless manual refresh)
  • You still need to check your real inbox
  • No integrated outreach sequences (separate purchase)

Problematic Contracts and Pricing

"We knew we were on an annual contract ending in March 2025. In December 2024, we asked to cancel. Thankfully we did - because Vincere/Access automatically renews your contract if you don't give 3 months' notice on a 12-month agreement. Miss that window and you could need to give 14 months' notice to cancel. Completely unreasonable."
  • Auto-renewal without clear notification
  • 3-month notice on annual contracts
  • Unjustified price increases (+6.5% in April 2025)

Cobalt vs Vincere: Detailed Comparison

Overview

CriterionCobaltVincere
PositioningUnified ATS+CRM+Staffing platformATS/CRM temp staffing
TargetStaffing firms, EU agenciesUK/EU staffing agencies
Price$89/user/month~$70/user/month (+ add-ons)
SupportHuman, responsive, localAI-first, degraded
ContractsFlexible, monthly possibleAnnual, 3-month notice
AINative, semantic searchBasic, third-party tools

Sourcing and Tools

FeatureCobaltVincere
LinkedIn extension✅ Developed in-house🟡 Third-party (Seha Solutions)
CV parsing✅ Native AI🟡 Third-party (Daxtra)
Indeed/Portal import✅ Automatic❌ Manual
Feature control✅ Full🟡 Limited (third-party)
Innovation✅ Fast🟡 Slow (dependence)
Vincere's third-party problem:
"Reliance on third-party tools means Vincere has no real control over its features, limiting customization options, and usually an indicator of slow innovation."
"Applications from Indeed and Vincere's own portal don't parse automatically into the ATS, requiring manual addition."
Sourcing Verdict: Cobalt develops tools in-house for more control and innovation.

Search and Matching

FeatureCobaltVincere
AI semantic search✅ Natural language
Boolean search
Manual tagging required❌ (optional)✅ (required)
Selection context✅ AI explanation
Search in notes/emails🟡 Limited
Candidate-job matching✅ Automatic AI🟡 Manual
Cobalt example:
Ask "Show me candidates with healthcare experience who have managed teams of 10+ people" and Cobalt instantly identifies matching candidates, scores them by relevancy, and provides an explanation for each selection.
Search Verdict: Cobalt offers AI natural language search, Vincere depends on manual tagging.

Outreach and Email

FeatureCobaltVincere
Automated email sequences✅ Integrated❌ (separate purchase)
LinkedIn sequences✅ Integrated🟡 Via Elay.io
Email sync✅ Real-time🟡 1x/day
Integrated inbox✅ (but desynchronized)
Templates
Vincere's email problem:
"Your inbox only syncs once a day unless you manually refresh. In reality, you'll be refreshing your regular inbox to make sure you're not crossing mails - very impractical."
"Vincere opted not to build any outreach cadence technology. You need to purchase this functionality from a separate provider, and it will not be integrated."
Outreach Verdict: Cobalt integrates everything natively. Vincere requires separate purchases.

Customer Support

CriterionCobaltVincere
Human support✅ Always available🟡 AI-first
Weekends❌ No human support
LanguageLocalEnglish
Response time< 2h averageVariable, slow
Ethical practices❌ Review manipulation reported
Vincere's support problems:
"Support is AI-first, and if the AI cannot assist, no human support is available on weekends."
"We have heard several people complain about receiving significantly less support after declining their paid add-ons."
Support Verdict: Cobalt offers human local support. Vincere has degraded AI support.

Contracts and Pricing

ElementCobaltVincere
Base price$89/user/month~$70/user/month
Add-ons needed❌ All included✅ Parsing, outreach...
Minimum commitmentMonthly possibleAnnual
Cancellation notice1 month3 months
Auto-renewal❌ Transparent✅ Without clear notification
Price increases✅ Justified❌ +6.5% unjustified
Vincere's contract trap:
"Vincere/Access automatically renews your contract if you don't give 3 months' notice. Miss that window and you could need to give 14 months' notice to cancel."
Contracts Verdict: Cobalt offers flexible, transparent contracts. Vincere has rigid practices.

Summary Table: Cobalt vs Vincere

CriterionWinnerComment
Customer support🏆 CobaltHuman vs degraded AI
Native tools🏆 CobaltIn-house vs third-party dependence
AI Search🏆 CobaltSemantic vs manual tagging
Integrated outreach🏆 CobaltNative vs separate purchase
Contracts🏆 CobaltFlexible vs 3-month trap
Email sync🏆 CobaltReal-time vs 1x/day
Base price🏆 Vincere~$70 vs $89 (but add-ons)
Temp staffing🟡 TieBoth suited
Ethics🏆 CobaltTransparent vs review manipulation

Conclusion: Vincere or Cobalt?

Choose Vincere if:

  • You're a UK temp staffing agency
  • You need integrated payroll/shift management
  • You accept rigid contracts
  • AI-first support works for you
  • You're willing to buy add-ons

Choose Cobalt if:

  • You're a European staffing firm or agency
  • You want responsive human support
  • You're looking for in-house developed tools
  • You want true semantic AI
  • You prefer flexible contracts
  • You want all-inclusive without add-ons
  • You value transparency and ethics

Ready to discover a better Vincere alternative?

Request a free Cobalt demo and experience truly human support and truly integrated tools.

Want to go further?

Discover how Cobalt can help you.

See demo

Ready to transform your recruitment?

Join the companies that recruit 2x faster with Cobalt.

Request a demo

Frequently Asked Questions

Vincere's support has significantly declined since the Access Group acquisition in 2021. Users report AI-first support with no human support available on weekends. Problematic practices are reported: less support after declining paid add-ons, and discount offers for positive reviews (Trustpilot manipulation).

Yes, Vincere heavily depends on third-party tools for key features: Daxtra for CV parsing, Seha Solutions for LinkedIn extension, Elay.io for automated outreach. This dependence limits feature control, slows innovation, and adds costs. Cobalt develops all its tools in-house.

No, Vincere contracts are very rigid. You need to give 3 months' notice on an annual contract, with auto-renewal without clear notification. Users report needing up to 14 months' notice after missing the window. Cobalt offers flexible monthly commitments with 1-month notice.

No, Vincere hasn't built native outreach technology (automated email or LinkedIn sequences). You must purchase this functionality separately, and it won't be truly integrated. Plus, the email inbox only syncs once a day. Cobalt integrates multichannel outreach natively with real-time sync.

No, Vincere search depends on manual tagging and Boolean queries. The system requires years of manual input to be effective and gives no context on why a candidate was selected. Cobalt uses true natural language AI that understands context and explains each selection.

Vincere is known for unjustified price increases with no clear link to product improvements. The latest increase set for April 2025 is 6.5%. Combined with necessary add-ons (parsing, outreach), total cost can exceed all-inclusive solutions like Cobalt.

Related Articles